![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
PC gaming is flourishing and becoming more diverse as the months go by, games developers are demanding more and more processing power and added hardware resources from component manufactures. There is a steady stream of essential hardware such as CPU's Graphics cards, RAM and chipsets being released. Constant evolution in hardware is undoubtedly the driving force behind the major developments and noticeable advances in this industry but there is one constant which it dragging it's feet.
Microsoft can rightly claim they make big efforts to enable developers to produce better and better games, this is evident by their constant development of DirectX, even if the updates are far and few between and can at times cause a myriad of compatibility issues.
Gamers that play high end games will always find ways to get the best from their games because they are willing and in most cases enjoy the challenge of configuring the OS to work at optimum performance with games.
If getting the best from Windows require configuring the OS by specifying what services you want to have running; dedicated gamers will do this. It's a laborious task but made easier by applications such as Nlite and you have to know what services to prevent from installing and what ones are essential to smooth operation of your computer.
End users that play mid range games are not going to get the best from their games and this is primarily because they do not have the knowledge or will power to configure Windows step by step.
Their games will have to cope with system resources being hogged by unnecessary services running in the background and this is far more apparent in mid ranged systems, which is what most of these users will have or low range computers sold as a general purpose computers.
Microsoft will always been seen has as a middle of the road OS developer because of this.
By now Microsoft should have developed a tool that is similar to Nlite and more user friendly, I'm sure they already though of this but the biggest possible stumbling block is; having a tool like this would make it clear to most user that a significant amount of the silent applications that come as a part of Windows is rarely needed and only serves to hamper the OS.
Microsoft could have also supplied two versions of Vista in one box set, instead of confusing the public; they could have created a version of Vista which does everything any home or small business user could want, a second version which would essentially be the same but striped of all services but the ones needed to play games and use multimedia applications. This would circumvent the need for the user to heavily customise the OS and allow a better gaming and multimedia experience for people that are not willing to put in the effort with the aim of getting better performance.
Naturally the gaming OS would be quicker to install because of the greatly reduced front print and would be as easy to load as rebooting your PC and choosing the correct OS option.
A third version would be needed, targeted at large scale Enterprise.













